編目園地推出LINE服務囉! 歡迎掃描QR Code立即加入編目園地的LINE@帳號, 每月編目園地的更新內容、國內外資訊組織報導等訊息將一次提供給您! |
詮釋資料是所有探索型檢索的基礎,幾乎是討論詮釋資相關運用時的定論。然而今日的 Metadata 正面臨一個轉型的挑戰。越來越強調創意的圖書館界,促使詮釋資料的管理和運用不得不進化,用更少的人力,來面對日增的資源型態及本身或跨機構的研究計畫。
這個報告討論了以下幾個議題
報告中有五個主要章節
RDA: Strategies for Implementation, Second Edition
由 Magda El-Sherbini 撰寫的本書第一版,曾經獲得 2014年 美國圖書館學會下屬的圖書館館藏與技術服務協會 的優良出版品獎項。
第二版加入了最新的 RDA 版本的更新資料。比較 RDA 和 AACR2 結構和概念上的差異,分享各館實施上的經驗,並且透過清楚的例子來說明一些新的 MARC21 欄位的運用。對入門者是個很好的導引,對實際的工作人員也是很好的參考資料。主要內容包括:
RDA in Practice: A Workbook
隨著 3R 專案對 RDA 及 RDA Toolkit 帶來的大量改變,一本能透過實際運用來學習 RDA 的工具書日漸顯得重要。本書的設計就是提供實務工作者,負責教育訓練的館員,以及課堂裡的每一個學生一個可以依據自己的進度來熟悉 RDA Toolkit 的作業簿。內容涵蓋了到 2020 九月的RDA的更新資料以及 2020 五月的 MARC21 的更新資料。作者 Kate James 長期切身參與 RDA 的相關委員會,也曾經是 RDA 3R 核心專案成員。本書涵括了所有 13 個實體/書目項目 (Entity),以及 RDA Toolkit 的整體架構和介面的說明。此外還包括了好幾個 MARC 或 非MARC 的習作,在一個預設的編目環境下,讓讀者可以建立實際的使用 RDA Toolkit 的經驗。
Maxwell’s Handbook for RDA: Explaining and Illustrating RDA: Resource Description and Access Using MARC21, Second Edition
Maxwell 手冊幾乎是編目圖書館員必備的工具書,從 AACR2 到 RDA 陪伴著編目館員走了好幾十年。作者 Robert L. Maxwell 贏得多項書獎,本書第一版並獲得 2014 ABC-CLIO Greenwood Award 圖書館學文獻最佳圖書的殊榮。第二版詳細解說 RDA近年來的改變,追上最新的發展趨勢。本書涵蓋各式的媒體類型,透過解釋條文和用例子來闡述 RDA。
更新 國家圖書館學位論文學校及系所(新增9校;修改4校)
新增 國家圖書館學位論文系所名稱或代碼新增、修訂一覽表(109年10月)
隨著鏈結資料的應用發展,探討如何將現有機讀編目格式資料轉變為鏈結資料已成為全球圖書資訊界(簡稱圖資界)探討議題之一。本文旨在隨著圖資界導入鏈結資料的演進歷史,分別選取三種機讀編目格式轉變為鏈結資料的方式與其個案為研究對象,採取個案研究為方法,再以全球資訊網協會鏈結資料工作手冊提出的發布鏈結資料作業項目及其他等八項為依據,分析上述方式及其個案的結果。本文個案包括批次大量轉變的大英圖書館與法國國家圖書館、鏈結型機讀編目格式的共享式虛擬探索環境及採用結構化資料標記綱要的圖書館鏈結網。結果發現初期圖資界重點在於以達成鏈結資料化的需求。之後,圖資界以鏈結資料驅動型資訊服務與網路曝光度為主要目標。
With advancement and application of linked data, it has become an issue how to transform existing MARC data into linked data in libraries. This paper aims to adopt case study as method to address three transformations from MARC into linked data in terms of evolutionary development of linked data in libraries. Eight tasks mainly borrowed from W3C’ Linked Data Cookbook have employed as a framework to analyze the case studies of three approaches used in library for linked data transformation as follows: British National Bibliography of British Library and Bibliothèque nationale de France for batch transformation, Share Virtual Discovery Environment for linky MARC and Library Link Network for Schema.org. As a result, initially the transformation in libraries has focused on triplification of linked data. Later, libraries has emphasized on how to deliver linked data driven information services and expose linked data based bibliographic data for increasing the visibility indexed and value added by search engines.
The active promotion of adult popular fiction in the public library is in need of theoretical justification consistent with that institution’s larger political project, a project it is sometimes said to undermine. In this article, the author surveys genre fiction’s modern-day discontents in the library field, then proceeds to consider a series of candidate justifications currently on offer in the LIS literature in an effort to resolve the alleged conflict between promoting fiction primarily read for entertainment and advancing democratic ideals. Upon revealing the empirical and theoretical inadequacies of each of these extant justifications, the author develops and defends an alternative in which popular fiction—and, more precisely, genuine aesthetic experience—serves as a resource for the development of dispositions necessary to democratic citizenship. Adopting this justification has far-reaching consequences for the ways in which librarians design and provide recreational reader services to adult patrons.
Harvard’s open access (OA) policy, which has become a template for many institutional OA policies, intrinsically undermines the rights of scholars, researchers, authors and university staff, and it adulterates a principal tenet of open access, namely, that authors should control the intellectual property rights to their material. Assessing the implications of Harvard’s open access policy in the light of Peter Suber’s landmark book, Open Access, as well as resources from the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) and Title 17 of the United States Code (USC), this article uncovers an intellectual ‘landgrab’ by universities that may at times not work in the interest of the author or creator of research and weakens the appeal of open access.
The mapping from BIBFRAME 2.0 to Resource Description and Access (RDA) is studied focusing on core entities, inherent relationships, and derivative relationships. The proposed mapping rules are evaluated with two gold datasets. Findings indicate that 1) core entities, inherent and derivative relationships may be mapped to RDA, 2) the use of the bf:hasExpression property may cluster bf:Works with the same ideational content and enable their mapping to RDA Works with their Expressions, and 3) cataloging policies have a significant impact on the interoperability between RDA and BIBFRAME datasets. This work complements the investigation of semantic interoperability between the two models previously presented in this journal.
At its most basic level, Hannah Turner’s Cataloguing Culture: Legacies of Colonialism in Museum Documentation could be understood as a case history of documentary practices of the Department of Anthropology of the United States Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) from its origins to the present day. At least, this is what its Cataloging-in-Publication data suggests with the subdivision “Case studies” for each of its five subject headings assigned: “National Museum of Natural History (U.S.); Museums — Collection management; Ethnologic museums and collections; Indians of North America — Material culture; and Museums and Indians.” In fact, Cataloguing Culture’s case study is a critical telescope that Turner turns upon a broad range of cataloging practices and perspectives common in galleries, libraries, archives, museums, and special collections (GLAMS).
國家圖書館編目園地電子報 第236期 2020/11/02發行
編輯:國家圖書館館藏發展及書目管理組
創刊日期:2001/4/2
本報著作權屬「國家圖書館」所有
服務信箱:catadm@ncl.edu.tw